Meaningless gun rights bills of little or no substance in Congress
Swarms of gun-grabbing officers are already breaking the 2nd Amendment and all laws ever made in pursuance of it. Without holding them accountable, what is the sense of passing yet more unenforceable laws on top of hundreds of burdensome, unconstitutional and ultimately void regulations?
H.R.38 - Constitutional Concealed Carry Reciprocity Act /119th Congress (2025-2026)
The intention may be good but there is nothing about home state laws or the licensing or alleged licensing of handguns in a “hometown” jurisdiction upon which one’s rights to keep or bear the said handguns in other states should depend. This is a particular fundamental, unalieanable and non-infringeable right enumerated in the Constitution.
H.R.7873 - Firearm Due Process Protection Act
118th Congress (2023-2024)
This too is well and good, and with respect to the “sense of the Congress” here mentioned, again, due process is already established and required by law without this act. When gun-grabbers are already breaking laws and violating due process, it does no good to pass additional laws without any intention of enforcing existing laws and legal principles of due process that already exist on the books.
Laws passed without spirit in the deadness of the letter of so many laws on the books already which are repugnant to the Second Amendment of the United States Constitution, are already void under the final judgment in Marbury v. Madison.
Bills or statutes proposed to be in favor of gun rights must not acknowledge previously passed unconstitutional gun regulations as constitutionally valid or effective.
Nothing in the Second Amendment suggests that the right to keep and bear arms ought to be restricted to law-abiding people; and indeed it is not and cannot be. The very fact that people who are not law-abiding already have guns regardless of the law is a very good reason for law-abiding people to keep and bear them as well.
The Second Amendment itself being a law, only law-abiding people can possibly be concerned with it as such. The suggestion, which I believe is inherent to the Second Amendment itself, is that law-abiding citizens should have access to any and all weapons to which violent criminals already have access regardless of laws.